<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Abuse of English</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dr-jan.com/newblog/2006/03/13/abuse-of-english/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dr-jan.com/newblog/2006/03/13/abuse-of-english/</link>
	<description>Highlights of Dr Jan's life, including cars, afternoon tea and other fabulousness :-)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 00:48:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: wallaceprime</title>
		<link>http://www.dr-jan.com/newblog/2006/03/13/abuse-of-english/#comment-134</link>
		<dc:creator>wallaceprime</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 20:23:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dr-jan.com/newblog/2006/03/13/abuse-of-english/#comment-134</guid>
		<description>Maybe it would be worth defining a fuzzy logic version of unique: euneek, perhaps? Appropriately rhyming with geek, the pair of e&#039;s could represent, in hexadecimal of course, the degree of uniqueness: from zero (00) to 255 (ee). Thus, euneek would be fully unique (maximum value of 255), with the lower end of the uniqueness scale of utter commonality being represented by eun00k (minimum value zero, 00).

Wally</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe it would be worth defining a fuzzy logic version of unique: euneek, perhaps? Appropriately rhyming with geek, the pair of e&#8217;s could represent, in hexadecimal of course, the degree of uniqueness: from zero (00) to 255 (ee). Thus, euneek would be fully unique (maximum value of 255), with the lower end of the uniqueness scale of utter commonality being represented by eun00k (minimum value zero, 00).</p>
<p>Wally</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wallaceprime</title>
		<link>http://www.dr-jan.com/newblog/2006/03/13/abuse-of-english/#comment-133</link>
		<dc:creator>wallaceprime</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 20:21:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dr-jan.com/newblog/2006/03/13/abuse-of-english/#comment-133</guid>
		<description>Maybe it would be worth defining a fuzzy logic version of unique: euneek, perhaps? Appropriately rhyming with geek, the pair of e&#039;s could represent, in hexadecimal of course, the degree of uniqueness: from zero (00) to 255 (ee). Thus, euneek would be fully unique (maximum value of 255), with the lower end of the uniqueness scale of utter commonality beeing represented by eun00k (minimum value of zero, 00). 
Wally</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe it would be worth defining a fuzzy logic version of unique: euneek, perhaps? Appropriately rhyming with geek, the pair of e&#8217;s could represent, in hexadecimal of course, the degree of uniqueness: from zero (00) to 255 (ee). Thus, euneek would be fully unique (maximum value of 255), with the lower end of the uniqueness scale of utter commonality beeing represented by eun00k (minimum value of zero, 00).<br />
Wally</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.400 seconds -->
